Friday, June 26, 2009

The King of Pop is dead, long live the King

10:38 AM mdk: Haven't been this sad since Britney shaved her hair.
10:38 AM csm: Because Cameron Diaz shaved hers in the tear-jerker "My Sister's Keeper" opening this weekend?
10:39 AM csm: Because Miley Cyrus said MJ was her inspiration?
10:39 AM csm: Because we'll never know where the other glove was now?
10:39 AM csm: Because Farah's posters will now be much more expensive?
10:40 AM csm: Because Farah and Ryan O'Neil never tied the knot before she died because she couldn't, as he requested of her, "Get out of that bed and get married"?
10:40 AM csm: Because now Neverland will have to become a museum and the sleep-overs we dreamed of in our youth will never happen?
10:41 AM csm: Because now Elvis will get a chance to punch MJ in the face for marrying his daughter?
10:41 AM csm: Because you'll have to get a refund for your tickets to the British shows?
10:42 AM csm: Because now, when you show up to work in a black sequined hat, short socks and one glove people will cry instead of smile?
10:42 AM csm: Because all that money spent on moonwalking lessons is wasted? Wasted, dammit! Wasted!!
10:43 AM csm: Because now a Charlie's Angel's reunion is as distant as a Beatles reunion?
10:43 AM csm: Because now Tito will have to sing "I'll be There" and it, somehow, just won't be the same?
10:44 AM csm: Because celebrities die in 3s, and with Ed MacMahon, Farrah, and MJ...Pauly Shore lives another day?
10:45 AM csm: Because Liz Taylor has added another soul to her devil's keychain of the dead and undead?
10:45 AM csm: Because we'll never know who Billy Jean's lover really was? (It was Quincy, it was always Quincy.)
10:47 AM csm: Because we'll be forced to watch interminable "Remembering Michael" shows ranging from Ellen to Oprah to primetime and even into late night?
10:47 AM csm: Because you just know Saturday Night Live is going to "go there". And it will be too soon. Way, way, too soon.
10:48 AM csm: Because Will Smith will have to play the "old MJ" in the biopic and his son will have to play "young MJ", and Jada Pinkett-Smith will be Janet and that will all be so wrong?
10:49 AM mdk: Don't make fun of the King of Pop!
10:49 AM mdk: Not today!
10:49 AM csm: The King of Pop is dead, long live the New King of Pop: http://www.tmz.com/2009/05/11/eminem-the-new-king-of-pop/

Thursday, June 18, 2009

We're Outnumbered, 2:1, not Counting the Microwave

There are no CRTs in our house any longer. A few months ago I took the last ones to the electronics recycling center. Couldn't give away a 17" CRT on craigslist nor freecycle.

Actually, that's not quite true. There is one old G3 iMac DV/SE that is unplugged and on the floor waiting for a data dump (next to a Kodak slide projector, waiting for same). Nonetheless, even discounting the comatose iMac, I count the blinkers and the breathers and "we" are outnumbered. Our home has a 2:1 computer/human ratio. That is, if you do count smart phones and do not count the Roomba robot (nor DVR, MP3 players, Amana, Kenmore, et al.). Include anything with a microchip in the census and, well, that war was lost a decade ago, I'm sure. Today that would include picture frames and light bulbs in addition to clock radios and automobiles.

Back to the things with keyboards/pads, and I note that in the Great Platform War we're divided on our systems 3/3 PC v. Mac. It tips 4/3 to the Mac if you count my iPhone as the Youngest One's Samsung smart phone is neither. Cheryl & I have our Macs from work, and we've a flat-panel iMac (largely unused) in the family room. The third Win platform (apart from the girls' laptops) is the Media PC hooked to the big screen for movies and gaming (aka The Stone Soup Blu-Ray Player), which is now running Win7 RC.

The shift to LCDs over CRTs was over before everyone in the house went to the blissful portability of a laptop. We also have 3 additional desktop PCs and their LCD screens unplugged and unused. While the girls shifted over to their laptops fairly readily, I believe it was the gradual decay of the desktop PCs--driven perhaps by malware?--that caused, one day, the switch to be left off. That, and unless you're gaming, or doing video-editing, there really isn't anything a laptop can't do that a desktop can't. Maybe the Youngest One would launch Hulu onto her 19" LCD desktop screen--but that's really a question of usable distance v. using the laptop's 5" smaller screen.

Three standalone inkjet printers tethered to those desktops and a flatbed scanner were replaced by one multifunction network printer last Xmas. You know, as I ponder it, the desktop as a USB printer host may have been the true anchor for those machines. Up until the network printer came online we were almost a "one person, one printer" household. I'd leave one desktop in the family room on with a shared USB printer, but the girls each had their own. Multiple printers, unless they're specialized (e.g., for photo printing, large format, duplex, etc.) aren't really economical. Especially if the host PC has to be on for them to work. Wireless network printing is the only way to fly.

As long as I'm describing the compute devices that don't have keyboards, I suppose I must include the Linksys/Cicsco NAS, with 2TB store--seemed like a good idea at the time, but has turned out to be a struggle. It doesn't appear that you can yet go DIY on a cheap NAS unless you hack the onboard linux kernel. Seems you only get a decent OS out of the box when you spend >$1k. The management UI is okay, but it just doesn't appear on the network from most devices. Interestingly, Win7 Media Player sees the media server library just fine, but Win 7 Media Center does not. Yep. Same machine, same network, same vendor. Different apps behaving differently.
From other Win systems or the Macs, only the FTP is available. The SMB/Wins hosts don't respond.

The sturdy WRT54G Wireless router has been serving yeoman duty, but is getting a bit long in the tooth. With Hulu in wide use in the house, and Netflix on Demand, the laptops and Media PC really need wireless-N. But what's surprising to me is that we have to have 10 ports open (and no, haters, the default "admin" is not the logon :^P ). The aforementioned laptops + Media PC + iMac, two smart phones w/wifi, our wireless "barn cam", and the printer. We had the barn cam port-forwarded to a DDNS server while the baby lambs were in the barn, but its been silent for a while. I'll have to set it up as a weathercam or something until it is next pressed into nursery duty.

I Hadn't done that kind of inventory in a while; I never would have guessed at that topology even five years ago. While we don't have exotic tech like a head-end 19" rack for our NAS, the need is also obviated by a reliance on wireless. There's a total of maybe 6' of Cat-5 in the whole house. I keep a spare line hanging off the router encase I need to reconfig, and the NAS is on a hardline as well.

Amazingly, the tech support load is low. Everyone is largely self-sufficient (the wireless/LAN printer driver addition to all computers was the most recent Big Change). That may be because I'm less available (or interested) in jumping into the fray when a small issue arises. And 7+ years with WinXP and OS/X breeds familiarity to the quirks and reset paths. The NAS is more a long-term project at this point as I return to poke at it when I think of it. I sometimes unplug it just because the fan is loud. Router or cable bridge reboots are rare.

Indeed, the only time all that tech causes me concern is when I get up at night for a glass of water and see all the LEDs blinking at me from various shelves and tables. The slow throb of an Apple notebook heartbeat light while it is asleep is kinda creepy. I've always said that as long as they have plugs, we'll still be in-control. Recharge over a wireless network? Not in my house. And if I ever hear the Roomba start up in the middle of the night on its own... Hmm. Maybe I'll put the wireless web cam to watching the Roomba in its dock. Just in case.

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

Don't Count Cadillac Out Yet

A friend tipped me to a pretty negative blog post about the Cadillac CTS Wagon, due to go on sale as a '10 model at the end of summer. It has been on sale in Europe, and Cadillac was going to bring it to the USA.

What started off in an email thread among friends really became a referendum on Cadillac and its role in the "GM Reinvention" world.

My friend wrote in the email thread, "I really, really wish GM would take Cadillac more in the direction of the Audis, Mercs, and BMWs of the world, but I think they are too afraid. And that's a shame, but I won't give up on them."

I submit that is Cadillac's answer to that wish:


Some see Cadillac's current position in the world market against the European luxo-sports lines half-empty, I see half-full. I think they are exactly aiming Caddy at the luxo-euros. This wagon is another example. Their halo car, the XLR, isn't a luxo-sedan, it is a two-seater, CLK and XJR in its sights (w/o BMWs Z8, you might ask them where they are, and wither Audi?).




And
they competed at LeMans for a few years in LMP1 (though perhaps w/o enough guts to continue to lose to Audi--as everyone else did). And on of the most notable concept cars in recent years, the Cien, was a supercar beast. Perhaps the only exception in the Caddy line is the DTS. But you just don't walk away from all the fleet-luxo and old-school US money market. You'd be just as crazy to tell Benz to stop making limos. OTOH, perhaps they should make those into Buicks and break clean with some of the old brand identity. I'll take your point about oldsters in the Caddy ranks and I'll posit that the problem isn't in GM marketing per se, but in the old dealer network for Caddy. They're doing the frontline marketing and it may be that's where the polyester-and-gold walks in the door. And salesmen tuned to that audience may not know how to pitch a bimmer-class car.

I think Jaguar had a similar problem; they're only just coming out from under that "old wool and lace" market (for their sedans).

Here's a like anecdote: when we bought our Jimmy Suburban from Moore Buick/GM in Los Gatos, the guy who served us was a Buick salesman. He talked to us more about the interior and ammenities than the seating and pulling capacity, though those criteria were the first things out of our mouth. Unlike when we went to the Santa Cruz Dodge dealer, where the trucks were across the street from the Nissans and VWs and Dodge cars. That guy could talk locking hubs all afternoon.

A Caddy dealer experience that is more like BMW may be what's needed. Because they do have the cars:



And let's not forget a young man named "Andy Pilgrim" and what he did for Cadillac for a couple years in the Speed GT Challenge. Beat the sox off my favorite driver, Randy Pobst who pedaled an RS6 around the same circuits.

As far as the suspension settings/choices, that may be the Old Dealer effect I mentioned above. You can't blame Caddy for the option boxes their customers check, or for building what people are buying. But back to the specifics of that blog. What Banovsky wrote is that Caddy is suffering from having customers that it doesn't want, so it shouldn't make cars for them. Instead, it should make cars for a different market and try to woo them. And this market shouldn't be performance luxury sedans but hybrids and diesels and brand-badged Volts. Oh, wait, they're doing all those.



Well, maybe. Turns out in this climate that all the cards haven't hit the table. GM may quit on the diesel for Cadillac in europe (a huuuge mistake, IMHO):

You can chip at Caddy; there's certainly a lot of grist for the mill. I just object to poor automotive journalism because it doesn't take a whole lot of effort to actually make some good points (as you can see here :^> ). Instead, Banovsky is just setting up straw men to knock them down, and wrap it in a snarky New Englander finger-and-tongue wag.

Just read his summary: "The CTS Wagon....has been borne from misguided market research."

Wrong. They're competing successfully with this car in Europe, it is made in the USA, we export it, and it is a platform that could be a Voltwagen or use the Chevy/Escalade hybrid electro-trans. What's not to like about that? If they only sell 30k in the USA this year (and Banovsky never sees one in a parking lot while he's antiquing) then remember this: Porsche sells fewer Cayennes than that in the USA and those sales are what kept Porsche in the black.

Further, if that market can be drummed up then we're poised to go, rather than saying, "Gee, when all those folk stopped buying LX500s and M-class Mercs, why didn't we have something in the wagon segment they're all flocking to now?" That's how you lead. You get your troops in the right spot prior to the assault. I don't think it is wrong at all. I think its pretty smart. And actually, Banovsky makes a pretty good case for it in his own writing, if you can just stick to the facts and pitch the "Yankee common sense".

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Casablanca in Blu

In one of my recent trips along the HD Movie aisle at Fry's Electronics store I noticed a Blu-Ray edition of Casablanca. It was tagged the "Ultimate Collector's Edition" and was full of frivolity, including a "passport holder", "luggage tag" (really...) and photo books, cards, etc. And more etc. Okay. However, the reason d'etre for this collection was the Blu-Ray transfer of the movie itself. So checkbox #1: you've got to have the movie. And why not? Casablanca is one of my favorite movies--and for whom is it not? It is Number 11 on IMDB's Top 250, and near the AFI's Top 100 list. Interestingly, Casablanca is the most represented film in the AFI's ballot for "Top 100 Best Movie Quotes". It is mentioned seven times! Here's one, a classic, #2 on the list.

Okay, I don't have to sell you on the movie. Checkbox #2 is, however, "Do you have it already?"

Well, yes, of course I do. I have two. One on VHS. And another on DVD. So now its time to pony up for the Blu-Ray, right?
But all those "Ultimate" goodies commanded a premium price. I don't really need or particularly want all that hoo-ha. What I was pondering as I held the box in the stores was this: would the Blu-Ray bring out that much more out of a 57-year-old print?

Amazon thinks so, they have a sales pitch video for it. Seven hours of extras, yeah, yeah. But the 2" web preview doesn't really let me know if it is really going to look and sound that much better. Don't get me wrong. If I didn't already have the DVD, I'd be on it like Captain Renault on Ugarte. But I do already have the DVD, and I also have a very good Toshiba A30 HD-DVD player with an excellent 1080p up-converter. Of course it would be good, but the question for me was, "would it be that much better?"

I'm at the point where I'm going to buy almost all new movies in Blu-Ray, I'll get closeouts I don't already have in HD-DVD because they're cheap, and I'll still shop the closeout bins for DVDs for relatively recent movies--because the transfers upconvert very well. For special movies, some "kaboom" flix or a special effects blockbuster or anything Pixar, I'll probably duplicate a DVD I already have in Blu-Ray. I mean (and I think I've asked this before), can you really have too many copies of 2001: A Space Oddesey? The answer is no.

But for movies I already have, on DVD, the bar is a bit higher. That's my point. I love Casablanca and it will probably be a go-to movie on many rainy nights in the future. But isn't the DVD pretty good? I've always thought it was.

The experience which lures me to wanting more was one of a few years ago (December 19, 2004 to be exact) when the City of San Jose reopened the California Theater, on South First Street. I'll save all the info I have on the California, nee, Fox movie house, for another post. On that one particular night my mom, my sister and I went to see Casablanca there. Courtesy of the David Packard Foundation. There was a newsreel (FDR, Churchill and Stalin in Casablanca!), a Bugs Bunny cartoon which featured "As Time Goes By" and some live organ music. All that culminating in a wonderful print delivered on a brand-new screen with state of the art projection and sound. It was sublime.

Could I get closer to that at home? I'm just talking degrees here, of course I don't have the kind of home theater setup that would rival the California. Or even the local cineplex shoebox. So discretion prevailed that day at Fry's and I put the box (and all of its "etc"s) back on the shelf. To be quite Candid about it, if it were just the disk, and the asking was $25 rather than $70, I probably wouldn't have thought twice. But I've got to be somewhat discreet with my video upgrade expenditures. There may be 50 candidate films in my collection I could replace in DVD with Blu-Ray. That's well more than a thousand dollar outlay for something I already posses.

But then the fates came to me. A co-worker had the Casablanca Blu-Ray and loaned it to me. Heaven! Better than that, because as the Stone Soup Blu-Ray Player and the HD-DVD upscaler are on separate HDMI inputs, I would be able to do a true back-back compare of the two disks.

And here, dear reader are my results. I don't have the time nor chops to present this comparison in a format akin to Tom's Hardware or other sites which do this for a living. I can also say that if you want someone else's textual analysis of the new release, there are plenty of reviews on the web. What you're going to get here is my amateur visual comparisons. Because that's what its all about, baby. Which one is better when you slot the disk and turn down the lights. No exotic measurements or tuning to the "nth" degree of output. This is a seat-of-the-couch evaluation. What's the best picture for your buck.

You can skip the next couple of paragraphs if you like; it is all about the technical bits.

The TV is a Samsung 46" LCD with 1080p, flourescent backlight and 15k:1 contrast ratio. A couple years old, but still very nice. Its got the shiny, not matte screen, great for films. The settings are out of the box, "Standard" (not "Movie") and with contrast and brightness settings in the middle. Color settings don't matter a whole lot here, but there was no color casting to the B&W print that I could see in either the DVD nor BLU-Ray. Feeding the DVD-side is the aforementioned Toshiba A30. In the Blu-Ray's corner is the SSBRP, which is an LG player driving an NVIDIA PureVideo® HD engine off an Asus M3N-HT Deluxe/HDMI Hybrid SLI motherboard. The player software is CyberLink's Power DVD 7. I took screen shots by hand with my Canon S5-IS at the widest zoom, fixed 1/60sec exposure with ambinent room (i.e., LCD backlight) lighting.

Sound output from the Toshiba is HDMI to the TV set, wheras on the Blu-Ray the sound is optical S/PDIF out to the Sony home theater reciever and its theater-in-the-box speakers. I should say right now that the audio was very obviously better, but the differences between the outputs make the comparisons difficult. From other reviews I understand that the sound hasn't been remastered, and that it was still in Mono, but it was clear and bright on both the DVD and the Blu-Ray. Not enough difference there for an upgrade repurchase.

So what were the visuals like? From the opening credits, the improvement in the transfer was apparent.


The text on the background map was much more legible and the drop shadow behind the title was clear and made the text pop with depth as was certainly originally intended.


After the narrative introduction with the model globe showing the route to Casablanca--there is this establishing shot of where our story takes place. Although it is actually a matte painting with an composite of the sky, the minaret, and a little figure walking the parapet. The figure is actually quite blurry and the Blu-Ray magnifies this, but this is decades before ILM mattes. I didn't give the minaret much space on the Blu-Ray side in the above mash-up, but you can click through on the links below and see the obvious differences.

Note especially the dynamic range in the sky as well as crispness in the minaret roof shadows. Truth be told, I didn't know the cityscape was a matte painting until I saw the Blu-Ray for the first time and could pause the picture. You can't do that at the movie theater! I should have known though as all the airport scenes (except the arrival of Major Strasser) are all mattes and models.


As nearly the entire movie takes place inside Rick's Cafe American, we skip ahead to the first musical number, where Sam leads the bar in a rousing rendition of "Knock On Wood". Here, in the busy background, you can see the depth of the lighting, the slight push to the contrast, but most of all the crispness of line and brightness. The DVD looks positively muddy by comparison. This wasn't just the camera or the brightness of the TV (though the latter could be adjusted to achieve some better parity, I suppose). The Blu-Ray just pops. This indeed does remind me of my night with Casablanca on the big screen at the California Theater.

With a crisper print details abound. I thought it was just wonderful that the extra at Sam's right arm was playing in the scene. You could see her facial expression as Sam runs his hand through his hair. Never saw that before!



For this shot of Rick, where he denies the Deutsche Bank representative access to the gaming tables, I didn't get the Canon in exactly the same spot between switching inputs. So the images are slightly different sizes. Rather than introduce artifacts by scaling in Photoshop, I decided to put them side-by-side here. Which is a better presentation of all the differences anyway. Look at the tile on the wall, and the pattern from the lightshade and shadows (the film is full of such rich lighting details). Notice the individual chess pieces and the shadows on their left sides in the Blu-Ray.

And most of all, notice Bogie's wonderful mug. The scar on his lip was clearly visible as were the pupils of his eyes. You might give the nod to the DVD's dynamic range when it comes to Bogie's forehead, however. Those famous brow wrinkles are just a little deeper, his face just a little wearier. I should mention that these are not frame-by-frame time-code matches in these pictures, so Bogie's brow might actually be a bit more relaxed. I just used the pause buttons and my eye to freeze the pictures, flipping back and forth on the HDMI inputs until I got a reasonable match.

If there is anything that the DVD's flatter contrast provides, it is that there might be a hint of a white-on-white stripe in Rick's dinner jacket (a Gasbarri of Rome, made for the movie for Bogie). But then again, that might be a moiré pattern introduced by the DVD transfer, the upscaling to 1080p for the DVD to the TV set or from the CMOS chip in the Canon camera I used for the caputre. I didn't notice it anywhere else.

Even if that is the case, everything else in the scene--the sets, the decor, the costumes and most of all the facial expressions, all pop with new clarity.


At Ilsa's introduction, where she asks Captain Renault about Sam at the piano, there is this exquisite close-up of Ingrid Bergman. Even with the soft-focus and halo lighting treatment by Arthur Edeson's crew, the Blu-Ray punches out detail. Though the contrast line just at her neck & hairline is lost, that might in fact demonstrate this transfer was taken right up to the edge of what is possible for the contrast ratio of video--or at least of my LCD screen. Who knows, the contrast gradient might be better on an LED-lit or Plasma screen? The grain introduced by the earlier transfer, subsequent scalings and computer intervention by the Toshiba is reduced in the Blu-Ray The lighting is made more uniform, and the removal of the sepia-like cast means the Blu-Ray image is very near like a publicity still.

I should mention that the reddish "bursts" on the upper and right edges aren't in the print, that's my halogen spot room lighting reflecting off the TV screen. In the larger files you can see curtain reflections as well. Mea culpa. This is my first time shooting off the TV screen.

Though I watched a little bit more of the movie (I had to stay in for that quote, "You played it for her, Sam you can play it for me!") I was ready to shut it down after the first half hour, return my borrowed copy and get one of my own, leather passport case and all. Truly and absolutely worth it.

I'm convinced: a great transfer makes a great movie....wonderful.

Thursday, January 22, 2009

DVD list

This isn't really so much for y'all, but for me. Its an easy place to go to glance at movies & TV shows on disk that I have. The full list is here, on Blist, and its viewable by the public (if you have a Blist account), but its nice they offer an embed.


DVD List

Powered by blist





From the ones that are listed "Blu-Ray", those are the ones I haven't watched yet, because of the continued inoperation of the Stone Soup Blue Ray Player. Stay tuned for more on that story, as I move from Vista to Windows 7 Beta. Woot!

Monday, January 5, 2009

Soup Blu-Ray Player: Chapter Two - Vista x64

It was last year that I started the saga of The Stone Soup Blu-Ray Player. I'll not recap, but give a catch-up: the Media-PC is about to, I'm afraid, be the recipient of its third Vista OS install. In trying once again to fix the Logitech MX Bluetooth keyboard's driver, the SoundMax HDMI-accessible driver was blown away. The machine doesn't see that the device exists. The Windows "native" drivers for the "HD Sound" won't install. So the SSBRP is, once again, rendered rather useless. Because there really aren't all that many silent movies released in Blu-Ray and though I can and do enjoy foriegn films with subtitles, I miss the music, sound-effects--and after-all, what's a sub-woofer without any woof?

How did I get to this state? Did the SSBRP ever work at all? Oh, yes. It worked. Gloriously. Beautifully. Not-quite-perfect-but-quite-serviceably-thank-you. Just the other night my son Chad, and his fiancee, Heather, were visiting from Las Vegas and Chad had brought along his Blu-Ray copy of The Incredible Hulk. We all watched it, and the "making of" special feature and I was quite happy. Prior to that I'd watched "Dark Knight", "Wanted" and "IJatTotCS", all in Blu-Ray. This going back to November when I'd finally straightened out the driver mess that I've come to understand is, inevitably, unfailingly, but quite regularly fallibly, Vista.

Could my life have been easier had I decided to go with Vista-32, the more direct decendant of XP? Surely. But I had a terabyte drive, the idea of multi-gigabyte video files and more addressable RAM than you could throw a pointer at. And I had four cores of 64-bit capable processor! Why would I leave all that on the table in the name of compatability and stability!!? Bah! Take me straightaway to the Bleeding Edge, Jenkins, and don't spare the cycles! Or sectors. Whatever. The point being that this was going to be a New Computer. I'd tried Ubuntu and though it was nice, we agreed to remain friends and talk occasionally, but well, it just wasn't mature enough for a lasting, committed relationship based on movie viewing (Hardy Heron, we'll always have DivX). So it had to be Vista, and what is it they say? In for a penny? Yeah. I went for eight bucks worth. Sixty four bits, to be punny about it.

One would like to think that an operating system produced by the Worlds Largest Vendor of said-same, and Richest Company, etc., and one that was mature by at least eighteen months, would be pretty well shaken-out, right? I mean, by the time Windows Millennium came around, Windows 98 had been around that long, right? And it was good enough so that "ME" was really a mistake to leave tried-and-true '98 for. The ME was the "wait for XP" edition. So I guess what has happened is that Vista, despite being eons in development is really the "ME" of the 21st century. Folk are clinging to their XP until, what's it called, "Seven"? Comes out. Seven. That's got cachet up the yin-yang, baby! Riiiight. But I digress.

An Endless Vista

Vista 64 should, by all rights, have vendor support and community support and lots of high-version drivers and software and devices and...and...and.... Well. It does have a lot of community support. It has to. One wonders if a course in being a Linux geek and having to figure all that out with the help of the fine Ubuntu User's Forum is a prerequisite for installing Vista x64 onto one's system. Let me tell you, friend. It couldn't hurt.

At the first attempt at living with Vista (now, in 2009, aka, "C:\Windows.old") I installed into a clean system. With no nVidia nor Asus nor LG (Blu-Ray) drivers. I was smart enough not to install the AirLink300 Wi-Fi card. Its XP drivers were nothing to sing home about (some of the worst Chinglish documentation and software strings I've seen since Epson manuals of the mid-80s), and so I wasn't pinning any hopes on finding Vx64 drivers. But I didn't need it, because the Comcast modem, with its loverly 8Mbps was just an RJ45 cable and a WRT54G 10/100 port away.

The initial install was fine. I tip that to the 'geers at nVidia and Asus, and to the fact that its pretty hard to get a reference VGA driver wrong. But props also to the fact that the onboard HDMI output worked from the get-go. But there wasn't any sound. 'Salright, I'm just warming up. More stones for the soup were to come. Registration occurred, nagging diminished, and I even managed to find my way through the very first layers of the onion that is Vista Security. I was able to turn off the nagware that is Vista's User Authorization Control (UAC). This is an absolute necessity when you're a safe and knowledgeable user installing vendor-provided software (i.e., you're not practicing unsafe warez). Otherwise, at each CD, at each setup.exe, you'll be asked, "Do you really, REALLLY want to do that, huh? Do ya? Do ya? Huh?" Or dialogs to that effect.

That the default for video and Human Interface Devices (HID--that's keyboard and mouse to you and me) worked out of the Vista DVD install was great. Because the Asus and nVidia softwares need an operating system to go against. So you can switch out of "800x600" mode and up to glorious 1080p (1920 x 1080 x 32bit) mode on that deliciously big screen. And so you can use the northbridge and southbridge chips for sound, and for the exotic bits that came with this motherboard, the "Hybrid SLI" mode--HDMI out through the motherboard connector from both the PCI-e MSI 9800GTX+ and ALSO the digital sound out from the LG Blu-Ray player.

Oh, yeah. I could taste it.

But what does any geek worth his salt do when he first puts together a new system? Install the CDs that came in the box? HEEELL, no! You go on the net and download the latest! And true to form, even though the motherboard was a scant four months old, there were updates to be had, and nVidia can be counted upon to have a Detonator set that's at least a rev newer than anything that has to make it all the way through a manufacturing chain--and that isn't even the Beta stuff!

So I started in with v178.xx (an old v151.xx was on the disk) and flashed the MB Bios and grabbed the latest MB drivers and... hmm. Some of the stuff wasn't quite right. Should I reinstall this one? Re-do the order? Maybe the Beta software.....hold on there, cowboy! This ain't your first rodeo. Put your professional hat on and start approaching this like an engineer and not a kid who's read too much Extreeeme PC. So I got out a fresh page of quadrille and started Keeping Records of All Changes.

To make a long (very looong) story short, the magic moment came when I applied sufficient discipline to change only one thing at a time and started with the software that came in the box. The magic pieces of which were the Connextant drivers which enabled the glorious HD sound out through the HDMI connector.

All Was Right With the World (or, Mmmm, Good Soup!)

The LG Blu-Ray disk came with a software bundle, and in it was a DVD player that supported Blu-Ray and HD-DVD. The only thing was...it didn't respond to mouse inputs. The Play and Stop buttons worked okay, but the in-menu controls didn't (like, "scene selection" and "special features". You know, trivial stuff). But the controls responded to the keyboard. Would an upgrade from the (perhaps crippled?) version work? I don't know, because they wanted $90 for the upgrade ("special pricing for LG Blu-Ray owners!" Uh. yeah. thanks.) At $120 for the player and $90 for the software, I could have easily bought a standalone Blu-Ray player. It was starting to look like that was going to be the best solution, and the SSBRP was going to be relegated to a gaming platform only.

But it did work to play HD disks. And using the keyboard wasn't horribly inconvenient. And besides, when one day I got a universal remote for the PC, maybe that stone would somehow make the soup the complete and satisfying meal it should be with the full adult minimum daily requirements of Niacin and Iron.

And so, we watched the Iron Man Blu-Ray in HD in all its glory! It was wonderful. And wanting is not always more satisfying than having. Although, in retrospect, having once had makes wanting once again an even more covetous state. But at that time, I had seen the future, and it was good in 1080p.

And then I got cocky.

To really get the best effect of Windows Media Center (WMC), you need to have a tuner, right in the computer. Someday soon all content will be by TCP/IP or some other IP variant [insert Net Neutrality plug here] but there's still a lot of broadcast and cablecast content that needs to be deplexed into channels. So I got myself another stone for the soup pot. A Pinnacle PCTV HD card was (I thought) a good buy. Maybe it was a good buy because it was about to be a discontinued item: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?item=N82E16815144018

But it was HD, and Pinnacle was a good name. There were Beta Vx64 drivers available. I told you I was cocky.

Unfortunately, when the software installed, it put a virtual shim into the sound driver stack. Makes sense, you have to output the sound the card receives to the computer output. But it totally busted the state-of-the-art HDMI and Hybrid-SLI driver stack. Undo, uninstall, reinstall, nothing worked. I tried registry edits with some clever GUID searches, but...Vista ain't exactly XP. The end-result was a non-functioning sound system. The system didn't recognize that there was any sound hardware installed for the drivers to work against--indeed even for the drivers to select the right hardware profile.

I might have continued fighting with this, but for one other problem. The Logitech Bluetooth MX keyboard and mouse combo. I installed their approved Setpoint ver 4.60 drivers for Vx64, but on launching the interface, there were only "help" and "update" tabs. The functional tabs that allow you to change mouse and keyboard settings simply weren't there. Shortly after my trials, Logitech tech support put up a note on how to maybe fix this problem--but it wasn't available then, and to discuss it now would be getting way ahead of my tale.

So I had no sound and a keyboard that was working but had some glitches. Like none of the multimedia keys worked. Okay, that's not entirely true; the volume wheel did work--but you wouldn't know, because of the motherboard sound problem. And more irritatingly, the spacebar launched WinMail. Really. The space bar. I don't know how that ever came to be a default keyboard macro, but imagine. Imagine typing in a path. Like, oh, "Program Files". Or a tech support question on the Logitech forum. I had to resort to using the mouse to select a space, then copy it to the clipboard, then use Ctrl-V instead of the space bar as I was composing. One slip and bang! WinMail in the foreground. I got good at "space Alt-F4 Alt-Tab Ctrl-V" key combos to correct my well-trained fingers. But you know, that's not really a skill that you want to get into muscle memory.

So after a few days, and with the release of Indiana Jones staring at me on the calendar, I capitulated. I did a reinstall.

Take Two: The Right Order

The second install was fairly straightforward. The only thing was that I didn't want to do a destructive install because I had all this downloaded driver content and installed programs (I had managed to get Halo going for a short campaign before audio meltdown). I had a hundred-odd megabytes of stuff on there. Now the sane thing to do would be to run a backup out to the NAS. After all, I have this old Buffalo system that has a couple hunnert Gigs. And it has another hunnert or so gigs attached to it via USB. All accessible through WINS. But wait! That would just be too darned easy for this project. The WINS it seems is the oldest implementation, going back to NT 3.x. Which is incompatible with more recent NTs and apparently Vista is "right out". Even following their techsupport suggestion of setting some flag for compatability from "2" down to "1" then to "0" still wouldn't allow my Vista to see the drive by browsing. I could get to the FTP server just fine, but no mounts. Credentials didn't match. I remember something from work about passing cleartext credentials in WinNT 3.x, but ye gods that was a long time ago and besides, I couldn't find it in my email archives. Anyway, it looked like I could manually xmit
and restore via FTP, or nuke it, or....just leave it where it was!

No reason to re-download it all again. I mean, I had a TERABYTE, bro! Wide open spaces. The plains as seen from the western banks of the Mississippi. So I did a non-destructive reinstall, and Vista handled that quite gracefully. "C:\" became "C:\windows.old". Think about that for a moment, and you'll see its a nice trick. The root partition stays the same, but everything is moved to within a subdir on that disk. In reality, its a couple of MBR pointers and away you go!

So score one for Vista. Minus a hundred for me having to reinstall in the first place. Or, rather, second place.

After the second installation, it was pretty straightforward to get all the drivers installed in the right order, following a plan I developed from re-reading my notebook on the first pass. So then I had a working baseline. The Pinnacle card was out. That will have to be revisited later. Maybe never, now that I see it is discontinued. Sigh. But the hybrid SLI and the HDMI sound were working again and channeling the Blu-Ray player properly. Plus I got the Logitech Momo Force Feedback Steering Wheel with Paddle Shifters working. So that was a big plus!

What do do when you have a stable system? Make a backup! I already knew the NAS was out of the question--put it on the list of future Stones to acquire, a NAS with more emphasis on the "A"-able. Making a backup to the same drive wasn't allowed. I wasn't about to try my years-old copy of Partition Magic in order to make a "D:\" drive on part of the unused "C:\" (besides potentially throwing the LG Blu-Ray into uncharted "E:\" territory). So the alternative was to make a full backup using DVDs. I'd even pop for the dual-layer.

But wait, it couldn't be that simple, could it? Of course not. Because the first time you make a "complete" backup on Vista, it wants to make a complete disk image. And in my case that meant an image of the couple-hundred gigabytes of "C:\Windows.old". Nevermind that I only wanted a small part of that, "C:\Windows.old\Users\Chris\Downloads". It wanted all or nothing. It told me to get 24 DVDs ready. Oh, no. Not me, brother. I'd already on more than one occasion had a "backup set" on 5.25" floppy disk (and later on 2.88Mb 3.5" disks) from "Fastback". Remember the cheetah on the box? Nothing speedy about it when you're trying to do a recovery and the entire index is on the last disk.

Please insert disk 48 of 50... Press Any Key.
Disk Unreadable. Abort, Retry, Continue?


So once again I decided to swing without a net, fly without a parachute, bathe without a raincoat...ahem. You get the picture. No backup, damn the torpedoes! Besides. I had a very workable system now, why would I want to do anything at the system level that would upset the applecart?

Indeed the system worked well for IJatKotCS, despite still not being able to use the mouse to navigate. And so I started in on buying Blu-Rays and setting them to be my preferred medium on Netflix. Nice. I wasn't quite ready to retire the Toshiba HD-DVD/DVD player, but the Ol' Vista box did have the ability to handle the whole shootin' match. Plus gaming. Yeah, baby. The Stone Soup was tastin' mighty good.

So it was with no surprise that after this holiday break, after watching Chad's copy of The Incredible Hulk on the SSBRP, after setting up print drivers to the family's new Epson Artisan 800 multifunction printer, and after moving the whole setup off the RJ45 tether to a nice Linksys/Cisco Wireless-N interface and into the family room (to make room for the Christmas tree, but we're going to leave it where it is), that I decided to tackle that keyboard problem again. Because, you know, that an FPS game uses to jump almost all the time, and though I could remap, the fingers already know that is jump. Launching WinMail in the middle of a tight Half Life Episode I session when you need to avoid some headcrab just isn't any fun.

Besides, Logitech now had ver 4.70 up on the website; I had reported the problem with the tabs, they had a technote on how to get past the issue and it had to come my way, didn't it?

Didn't it just have to work out for me eventually?

Stay tuned for the Entree course on the Stone Soup Blu-Ray Player dining experience.